Sellise loo otsa sattusin: http://web.me.com/sinfonia1/Clamour_Of_The_Times/Clamour_Of_The_Times/Entries/2010/1/30_Global_Warming%3A_the_Collapse_of_a_Grand_Narrative.html
:)
Monday, February 8, 2010
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Laurent Wolf - Wash My World!
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Friday, January 29, 2010
NASA eelarvest kriipsutati maha Kuule tagasi minemise projekt
Obama administratsioon on presidendi vaikival heakskiidul eelarve üle vaadanud ja kärpinud NASA eelarvet usinalt - kadunud on sealt programm nimega "Constellation", mis peaks ameeriklased uuesti kuule viima. Paistab, et võidujooks 2020 aastal taaskord inimese Kuule panemiseks on kaotatud eos - võimalik, et sellega üritatakse teiste kosmoseriikide poolt üles pandud lõksust välja astuda. Suund on edaspidiselt maakera jälgimisele määratud, eeskätt näiteks kliimasoojenemise mõõtmisele. Anonüümseks jäänud ametniku sõnul polevat Kuule tagasi jõudmine mingil juhul oluline ning seetõttu ka raha projektiks ei jagata.
http://www.minut.ee/article.pl?sid=10/01/27/2338202&mode=nested
http://www.minut.ee/article.pl?sid=10/01/27/2338202&mode=nested
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Climategate Redux: IPCC Forced to Retract Alarming 2007 Warming Report
 |  |  | del.icio.us |  |  | 91 comment(s) - last by elgueroloco.. on Jan 26 at 5:49 PM |
IPCC's chairman under pressure to step down after embarrassing retraction
The United Nation's International Panel for Climate
At the center of the policy push is the IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri. Mr. Pachauri has no formal education in climatology, yet was appointed in 2002 to lead arguably the world's most influential climatology panel. Since, he has stirred up much controversy, suggesting that people internationally give up meat to fight climate change and supervising the publication of alarming climate change predictions.
However, Mr. Pachauri's days as IPCC Chairman may be nearing an end. Mr. Pachauri has been forced to retract an alarming publication in which he claimed Himalayan Glaciers would melt by 2035. Many in the general public and research community are calling for his resignation in the retraction's wake.
Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, vice chairman of the IPCC, is doing his best to defend his boss's controversial remarks. He calls them a "human mistake" and comments, "Aren't mistakes human? Even the IPCC is a human institution and I do not know of any human institution that does not make mistakes, so of course it is a regrettable incident that we published that wrong description of the Himalayan glacier."
Mr. Pachauri's publication was made more controversial by his harsh criticism of those who questioned it. He said that climate skeptics used "voodoo science" and urged the climate research community and international governments to ignore their concerns.
Mr van Ypersele, professor of climatology and environmental sciences at the Catholic University of Louvain defends these remarks. He states, "I would personally not have used the voodoo science wording. I think humans can sometimes use words that are a bit too strong but it is certainly not a reason to ask for the resignation of a chairman who has done an excellent job. We are trying to do our best, we are going to reinforce the review procedures so the probability in the next report of such incidents happening is even lower. But to guarantee a zero fault product is probably not possible for any human enterprise."
Perhaps the more troublesome topic, however, is the report itself. The IPCC 2007 report contained both the questionable glacier reference and highly questionable conclusions about global warming creating a bevy of natural disasters. Before its recent retraction, the report was driving international climate legislation, including pending legislation in the U.S. that is estimate to leave Americans $9.4 trillion USD poorer.
The report was supposedly reviewed by the IPCC's 2,000 members. Argues Mr. van Ypsersele, "We are trying to do the best job we can in assessing the quality information about climate change issues in all its dimensions and some do not like the conclusions of our work. Now it is true we made a mistake around the glacier issue, it is one mistake on one issue in a 3,000 page report. We are going to reinforce the procedures to try this does not happen again."
He claims the retraction will not impact the publication's credibility and stands behind the report's other controversial claims, including the prediction of natural catastrophe. He states, "I would like to submit that this could increase the credibility of the IPCC not decrease it. Why is that? Would you trust someone who has admitted an error and is ready to learn from his or her mistake or someone who claims to be unassailable? The IPCC does not claim to be unassailable, when there is a good reason to admit a mistake we do it, but for the rest of IPCC conclusions we stand by it very strongly"
Mr. Pachauri, who holds advanced degrees in industrial engineering and economics, has blasted Westerners for leading an "unsustainable" lifestyle. Curiously, though, according to the British newspaper, The Telegraph, "[Pachauri] enjoys a lavish personal lifestyle; his Delhi home is in the Golf Links area, the most expensive stretch of residential real estate in India, and he is famous for his '$1,000 suits'."
However, Mr. Pachauri's days as IPCC Chairman may be nearing an end. Mr. Pachauri has been forced to retract an alarming publication in which he claimed Himalayan Glaciers would melt by 2035. Many in the general public and research community are calling for his resignation in the retraction's wake.
Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, vice chairman of the IPCC, is doing his best to defend his boss's controversial remarks. He calls them a "human mistake" and comments, "Aren't mistakes human? Even the IPCC is a human institution and I do not know of any human institution that does not make mistakes, so of course it is a regrettable incident that we published that wrong description of the Himalayan glacier."
Mr. Pachauri's publication was made more controversial by his harsh criticism of those who questioned it. He said that climate skeptics used "voodoo science" and urged the climate research community and international governments to ignore their concerns.
Mr van Ypersele, professor of climatology and environmental sciences at the Catholic University of Louvain defends these remarks. He states, "I would personally not have used the voodoo science wording. I think humans can sometimes use words that are a bit too strong but it is certainly not a reason to ask for the resignation of a chairman who has done an excellent job. We are trying to do our best, we are going to reinforce the review procedures so the probability in the next report of such incidents happening is even lower. But to guarantee a zero fault product is probably not possible for any human enterprise."
Perhaps the more troublesome topic, however, is the report itself. The IPCC 2007 report contained both the questionable glacier reference and highly questionable conclusions about global warming creating a bevy of natural disasters. Before its recent retraction, the report was driving international climate legislation, including pending legislation in the U.S. that is estimate to leave Americans $9.4 trillion USD poorer.
The report was supposedly reviewed by the IPCC's 2,000 members. Argues Mr. van Ypsersele, "We are trying to do the best job we can in assessing the quality information about climate change issues in all its dimensions and some do not like the conclusions of our work. Now it is true we made a mistake around the glacier issue, it is one mistake on one issue in a 3,000 page report. We are going to reinforce the procedures to try this does not happen again."
He claims the retraction will not impact the publication's credibility and stands behind the report's other controversial claims, including the prediction of natural catastrophe. He states, "I would like to submit that this could increase the credibility of the IPCC not decrease it. Why is that? Would you trust someone who has admitted an error and is ready to learn from his or her mistake or someone who claims to be unassailable? The IPCC does not claim to be unassailable, when there is a good reason to admit a mistake we do it, but for the rest of IPCC conclusions we stand by it very strongly"
Mr. Pachauri, who holds advanced degrees in industrial engineering and economics, has blasted Westerners for leading an "unsustainable" lifestyle. Curiously, though, according to the British newspaper, The Telegraph, "[Pachauri] enjoys a lavish personal lifestyle; his Delhi home is in the Golf Links area, the most expensive stretch of residential real estate in India, and he is famous for his '$1,000 suits'."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
